The return of Kazuma Kiryu in Yakuza: Like a Dragon divided fans. While some celebrated the iconic protagonist’s comeback, others argued his presence overshadowed the new protagonist, Ichiban. Now, with the game’s release behind us, it’s time to ask: was bringing back Kiryu the right call for Yakuza?
The Argument for Kiryu’s Return
Yakuza’s producers maintained that Kiryu’s inclusion was always part of the plan. His return was seen as a treat for fans, a way to celebrate the series’ legacy and provide closure to Kiryu’s story arc. Additionally, his popularity and recognition were undoubtedly a draw for players.
The Counterpoint: The New Face
Despite Kiryu’s immense appeal, Yakuza: Like a Dragon centered around Ichiban, a fresh face with a different background and motivations. Some players argued that Kiryu’s presence dominated the narrative, diminishing the impact of the new protagonist. Additionally, some felt the game relied too heavily on nostalgia, neglecting to develop new narratives and characters.
The Balancing Act: Satisfying Old Fans and Introducing New Ones
Ultimately, Yakuza’s success lies in balancing the needs of both old and new fans. While Kiryu’s return was undoubtedly pleasing for those who have followed the series for years, it’s important to acknowledge that new players need a clear entry point. The inclusion of Ichiban was a necessary step in welcoming new audiences and ensuring the series’ long-term survival.
The Verdict: A Mixed Bag
The debate surrounding Kiryu’s return is likely to continue. While some argue his presence was justified, others maintain the focus should be on the new protagonist. Ultimately, the game achieved its goal of satisfying both groups – delivering both closure for Kiryu fans and a new chapter for the Yakuza franchise.
Buy From: Nike Kyrie 6 ‘There Is No Coming Back’ Photon Dust/Green Strike / Theres No Coming Back